Free
Message: Re: Doni/LL/Post deletion - wolfy...jef/Frank others reporting SHM info
1
Sep 18, 2008 02:30PM

Sep 19, 2008 04:47AM

Sep 19, 2008 04:56AM
1
Sep 19, 2008 05:22AM

Sep 19, 2008 06:01AM
6
AGORACOM
Sep 19, 2008 06:02AM

Sep 19, 2008 06:06AM
3
Sep 19, 2008 06:17AM
1
Sep 19, 2008 06:39AM
2
Sep 19, 2008 07:05AM
6
Sep 19, 2008 07:15AM
1
Sep 19, 2008 07:19AM
1
Sep 19, 2008 07:28AM

Sep 19, 2008 07:34AM

Sep 19, 2008 07:52AM

Sep 19, 2008 08:21AM

Re: Doni/LL/Post deletion - wolfy...jef/Frank others reporting SHM info

posted on Sep 19, 2008 09:22AM

The first and only question I asked this morning.

It has been stated that the lawsuits are only about the playback capability of the flash drive as opposed to the internal memory.

Perhaps I missed something, but then why is DM including all 5 patents in the lawsuits?

Either RP or PN has stated incorrectly the DM intent of the lawsuits or those reporting the meeting results have misunderstood the information communicated by the edig team since all 5 patents have been introduced as part of the lawsuits.

If settled only on the playback issue, then the other patents would become void for each infringer.

Something is incorrect and needs clarification.



3
Sep 19, 2008 09:58AM
6
Sep 19, 2008 10:12AM

Sep 19, 2008 04:00PM

dlj
Sep 19, 2008 08:13PM
7
dlj
Sep 19, 2008 08:38PM

Sep 19, 2008 08:45PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply