The first and only question I asked this morning.

It has been stated that the lawsuits are only about the playback capability of the flash drive as opposed to the internal memory.

Perhaps I missed something, but then why is DM including all 5 patents in the lawsuits?

Either RP or PN has stated incorrectly the DM intent of the lawsuits or those reporting the meeting results have misunderstood the information communicated by the edig team since all 5 patents have been introduced as part of the lawsuits.

If settled only on the playback issue, then the other patents would become void for each infringer.

Something is incorrect and needs clarification.