For the most part, you offer nothing constructive other than opinions slamming the company and it's efforts.

Whoaa ... you really mean to say that about LL? His take on legal processes has been spot on the money, and his predictions about how things might go for the edig cases has been somewhere over 90% accurate. (Okay I don't have a chart with all his predicted outcomes vs the actual outcomes, but that's my sense of the case history).

He offers nothing constructive? Why don't we just start saying you offer nothing constructive. From what I have observed in politics, it becomes true eventually in a lot of mnds if we just keep saying it and saying it and saying it. But it would be no more true about you than saying it about LL.

You've earned thanks and accolades by your efforts to educate the board on the technical end. The legal end is no less relevant, important or constructive to our understanding of the potential for edig.

Wolfy