RP DID NOT SAY A THING about proving an infringement. That was all 100% PN. All RP said was he was at MANY settlement meetings.

If DM has COMPLETE CONTROL over the lawsuit proceedings, according to RP himself, then one has to assume, unlesss you are a complete idiot that DM attorneys were at these meetings, unless it was the other way around....

Meaning DM called the settlement meeting and had RP and PN there as technical advisors and reps of the company......

And by the way, PN DID SAY IT WAS THAT EASY.....

It has always been my opinion, shared by many here and alluded to, that "low hanging fruit" was first in the lawsuit line. If that is true then it makes sense why these infringement cases are being handled the way they are.

Again at the SHM it was stated that 774, THE RFMARP, was the ONLY patent be charged as being infringed on because IT WAS THE EASIEST AND QUICKEST TO PROVE...

I am quite sure there is much to this, but only after a few "mea culpas" show up and when there is a fat bank account with EDig's name on it.

I would suggest you read, in it's entirety patent 774. It is quite