1. It seems obvious to me that LG (or anyone else) would INSIST upon a license to our ENTIRE IP portfolio. WHY would a company pay us a fee for only a single patent and say, in effect: "Thanks, it's been great. Feel free to SUE our butts again if you decide that we've infringed on any of your other precious patents." I'm sorry but if anyone heard differently, then you mis-understood. Billion dollar companies with million dollar lawyers don't leave themselves open to being stung twice by the same company.

I hope you are right.This would mean a larger settlemnt for us.