yeah, , I figure out my problem. For some reason I had it in my mind to equate the 95% to the revenue number, where it was plainly a % of receivables due.
It was just not jumping out at me for some reason.
I haven't paid attention to the financials in all the time I've been involved, I figured it wasn't worth the effort....no income is no income.
Now that they are due for some real income I will be reviewing them...asking questions for whatever it takes to understand them.
Now what about...lol
prior...
13. INCOME TAX
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on April 1, 2007 and commenced analyzing filing positions in the Jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no adjustment for uncertain tax provisions and the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of April 1, 2007 was $-0-. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Act) provides pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383 for a limitation of the annual use of NOL and research and development tax credit carryforwards (following certain ownership changes, as defined by the Act) that could significantly limit the Company's ability to utilize these carryforwards. The Company has experienced various ownership changes as a result of past financings and could experience future ownership changes. The Company's ability to utilize the aforementioned carryforwards may therefore be significantly limited. Additionally, because U.S. tax laws limit the time during which these carryforwards may be applied against future taxes, the Company may not be able to take full advantage of these reduced attributes for federal income tax purposes. The Company has not performed an analysis of its deferred tax assets for net operating losses or any possible research and development credits sufficient to meet the more likely than not threshold required by FIN 48. Accordingly, the deferred tax assets related to net operating losses and the offsetting valuation allowance were removed from deferred tax assets at April 1, 2007 until such an analysis is documented.
current:
As discussed above, as of April 1, 2007, the Company removed its net operating losses from deferred tax assets and the offsetting valuation allowance until documented by a Section 382 analysis. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008 the Company provided a tax provision of $264,000 representing foreign taxes for which a credit (a deferred tax asset) may be allowable against future United States taxes subject to certain limitations. A full valuation allowance has been established to offset the remaining net deferred tax assets (after applying sufficient net operating losses to offset current income) and to the new foreign tax credit at December 31, 2008 as realization of these assets is uncertain. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008, the deferred tax expense of $755,000 and $543,000 respectively, was offset by a corresponding decrease of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. When, and if, the Company can sustain consistent profitability, and management determines that it is likely it will be able to utilize the net operating losses prior to their expiration and the amounts are adequately documented, then any additional valuation allowance can be reduced or eliminated.
comments welcome...
doni
