Is it correct that only a hub leader can suggest that a post should be deleted, then if Agora agrees, they are the ones who do so? This would mean they would have to monitor boards 24/7, holidays included. I'm not clear on how this is done?

If a day ever comes that I feel the need to delete a post, and it would have to be absolutely disgusting and an obvious violation the the 6 rules, I will publicly state I was the person who did it.

Richardo stated he was going to delete the Soros post, but it was already gone..words to that effect. LawyerLong said he was going to report it. I applaud this transparency.

JMO, but if someone feels the need to delete a post because it's a violation, or not in the best interest of EDIG investors, any reason what so ever, be adult enough to state that you did it an why.

I don't feel a post deletion is censorship, if in fact the purpose of this action is to keep this board professional and on topic, but I for one would like to know who did this for me, each and every time.

What do the rest of you think?