Free
Message: Re: PACER Avid
13
Mar 13, 2009 11:31AM
21
Mar 13, 2009 11:35AM
1
Mar 13, 2009 11:55AM

Re: PACER Avid

posted on Mar 13, 2009 12:02PM

LL, I agree with your combination theory. If our patents weren't sound I think they would have fought more (afterall, they are #1 in IP litigation). And if the settlement amount DM was asking for was reasonable, Fish would advise Avid it's in their best interest to take it and press on with their business.

12
Mar 13, 2009 12:14PM

Mar 13, 2009 12:20PM

Mar 13, 2009 02:49PM
8
Mar 13, 2009 02:57PM

Mar 13, 2009 03:33PM
4
Mar 13, 2009 04:14PM
2
Mar 13, 2009 04:22PM

dlj
Mar 13, 2009 04:35PM

Moo
Mar 13, 2009 05:47PM
2
Mar 13, 2009 06:41PM

Mar 13, 2009 07:02PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 02:11PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:17PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:24PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 06:40PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:55PM
1
Mar 14, 2009 06:58PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply