Free
Message: Re: .127 X .15 odd eom HRH-Disch

Jun 04, 2009 08:02AM

Jun 04, 2009 08:09AM
1
Jun 04, 2009 08:19AM

Jun 04, 2009 08:29AM
1
Jun 04, 2009 08:29AM

Jun 04, 2009 08:31AM

Jun 04, 2009 08:42AM

Jun 04, 2009 09:37AM
2
Jun 04, 2009 09:50AM
3
Jun 04, 2009 10:39AM
2
Jun 04, 2009 10:45AM
1
Jun 04, 2009 11:33AM
2
Jun 04, 2009 12:38PM
2
Jun 04, 2009 03:57PM
2
Jun 04, 2009 04:02PM
5
Jun 04, 2009 04:29PM
3
Jun 04, 2009 05:29PM
2
Jun 04, 2009 05:38PM
2
Jun 04, 2009 05:52PM

Jun 04, 2009 06:03PM
8
Jun 04, 2009 06:31PM

Ahh, so DABOSS is the only one who thinks a rise in the pps based on a record year in revenues, new DM filings and first time profitability, not to mention debt reduction or elimination, is likely.....just love that pie in the sky56 version.

Twisting the night away are we?

And, of course, you, sky, are invested to stay flat and play down 2 years of accomplishments with documented results based on EDIG's patents....because the anti-pump theme will somehow get you into heaven?

So please explain again why higher levels will not be warranted from this point forward....and also what it is your investment is waiting to have transpire before you can admit you invested to see a higher pps?

Tell us the real reason, weeks before earnings release, that you single just one investor out, and why it is you miss the negativity?

Looking to start EDIG wars because investors are liking the prospects facing them?

Can't wait...it's been weeks since we were infected with such counter productive measures.


14
Jun 04, 2009 10:04PM
6
Jun 05, 2009 04:08AM
12
Jun 05, 2009 04:49AM
5
Jun 05, 2009 05:51AM
5
Jun 05, 2009 06:46AM
1
Jun 05, 2009 02:14PM

Jun 05, 2009 02:38PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply