I'm simply NOT going to change up any of your statements, but rather comment on something you said.

"Very little information coming out of the company regarding what else is going on? This could be remedied by better communication (my main complaint with the company). "

I see no difference from the lull between the first sets of filings. DM is picking their spots while still engaged in the SAMSUNG case...the only case not yet settled. There will be more filings per the company.

This is how this works now and will apparently work for the next 180+ cases as DM calls the shots, files cases, litigates and then works to settle and yield EDIG profits. This is what the company has told us. They do not control the timing.

If DM changes their advice to EDIG regarding the sharing of info then I am sure they will share the info as they know investors are extremely curious and interested.

Why wouldn't EDIG share such information if they could?