Free
Message: Re: CONTRIBUTORY PATENT INFRINGEMENT - doni
2
Jul 27, 2009 06:16PM
8
Jul 27, 2009 08:35PM

Jul 27, 2009 09:01PM
8
Jul 27, 2009 09:34PM
14
Jul 27, 2009 10:46PM
1
Jul 28, 2009 12:51AM
16
Jul 28, 2009 01:21AM
4
Jul 28, 2009 01:43AM
6
Jul 28, 2009 07:25AM
3
Jul 28, 2009 11:45AM
9
Jul 28, 2009 12:00PM
5
Jul 28, 2009 12:29PM
16
Jul 28, 2009 12:29PM
3
Jul 28, 2009 01:01PM

Jul 28, 2009 01:01PM
8
Jul 28, 2009 01:02PM
7
Jul 28, 2009 01:03PM
3
Jul 28, 2009 01:14PM
1
Jul 28, 2009 01:49PM
2
Jul 28, 2009 01:56PM
2
Jul 28, 2009 02:22PM
2
Jul 28, 2009 02:49PM
9
Jul 28, 2009 05:43PM
21
Jul 28, 2009 06:41PM
1
Jul 31, 2009 09:48AM
1
Jul 31, 2009 09:57AM
1
Jul 31, 2009 10:03AM
10
Jul 31, 2009 10:40AM

Re: CONTRIBUTORY PATENT INFRINGEMENT - doni

posted on Jul 31, 2009 11:09AM

"I know one thing that dinkie kept emphasizing as a basis for his considerable knowledge in this area was his engineering and related work experience."

With that, he brought nothing to me that added to my understandings of e.Digitals tech.

It's not about me, it's all on DM's shoulders now....so you do not have to worry about my opinions or my credentials.....DM is now validating.

In the end you will see that what opinions I make are very close, if you have an understanding of what to look for, if or when they do explain it to the public.

I know one thing, I have specifically gone back and fourth with you, way before DM's arrival, over "caching and bit stream",where I'm sure you will refute the dialog. I have been plugging this thought as far back as my days on the RB with commentary involving DR. Hunt and others....and how that would be the first issue to investigate.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply