Free
Message: Re: pacer very interesting...banker... obligation are ?
2
Sep 15, 2009 01:10PM

Sep 15, 2009 01:10PM
5
Sep 15, 2009 01:14PM
4
Sep 15, 2009 01:18PM

I wonder what the reason is that the SAMSUNG settlement is taking considerably longer than the other 6 settlements, although it now appears to have concluded.

I am sure that all conditions stipulated by DM are negotiable, as these stipulations were the baseline DM set up for taking the case on a contingency basis. Now that the risks are better known and the results are tangible, anything is possible...and negotiable.

1) one time settlement as was the case in the previous six cases

2) Buy out

3) Settlement and investment stake

One thing for certain is that this continues to move forward to our advantage.

6
Sep 15, 2009 01:54PM
4
Sep 15, 2009 04:30PM
2
Sep 15, 2009 07:18PM
2
Sep 15, 2009 08:08PM
4
Sep 15, 2009 11:05PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply