nosenothing perhaps the civil example vrs criminal analogy is off however I think everyone gets the point . It is my understanding that in a patent case it still has to be accepted as a case prior to going to trial . That acception ( whatever the term is ) validates that there is a reason to go to trail . Again if edigs technology had no value the case would not have gone anywhere and would have been dismissed . You cannot approrach the court with frivolous lawsuits . A continual approaching of the court fwith frivilous baseless lawsuits has ramifications from the bar .

Nuisance frivilous call them what you want. the facts are they had basis for going to court . A compay recently was accused of having no basis for a lawsuit based on infringement claims . that company then threatened to shut down 300 million users worlwide and miraculously was paid 600- 900 million or so. the infringer was non other than blackberry rimm

Just because a lwayer or firm says it isnt so doesnt make that factual . patent 774 has been infringed upon 100s of times over bottom line