Re: PACER...doni...
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 28, 2010 10:54AM
"Your list did not mention IMATION?'
See defendant #7 0n my list...
"Most of the ANSWERS had to be filed due to Court ORDER denying defendant's Group Motion to have the Markman first, even before they filed their ANSWER..."
Interesting.....I understood there was a question of what should happen first ....claims construction(defendants wanting technicals processed) or discovery(e.Digital wanting to know exactly what products are involved)....
I was under the impression "answers" were to happen first no matter what angle the court would allow, but, then I guess it would make sense(from a defendant's prospective) that they have a better idea of what technicals e.Digital will eventually advance in order to form a better defend able answer.
Anyway, the ducks are all in order after 5 months, and I take it you are conveying to us the defendants are not going to gain any insight before their answer.
score so far 0-0 lets begin
Thanks
doni