Free
Message: Re: PACER...doni...
11
Mar 26, 2010 06:50PM
8
Mar 26, 2010 07:13PM
6
Mar 26, 2010 07:25PM
11
Mar 26, 2010 08:58PM
10
Mar 26, 2010 10:19PM
2
Mar 26, 2010 10:29PM
3
Mar 26, 2010 10:46PM
7
Mar 27, 2010 12:57AM
12
Mar 27, 2010 01:19AM
6
Mar 27, 2010 01:26AM
6
Mar 27, 2010 12:45PM
1
Mar 27, 2010 12:49PM
3
Mar 27, 2010 01:52PM
1
Mar 27, 2010 03:23PM

"Your list did not mention IMATION?'

See defendant #7 0n my list...

"Most of the ANSWERS had to be filed due to Court ORDER denying defendant's Group Motion to have the Markman first, even before they filed their ANSWER..."

Interesting.....I understood there was a question of what should happen first ....claims construction(defendants wanting technicals processed) or discovery(e.Digital wanting to know exactly what products are involved)....

I was under the impression "answers" were to happen first no matter what angle the court would allow, but, then I guess it would make sense(from a defendant's prospective) that they have a better idea of what technicals e.Digital will eventually advance in order to form a better defend able answer.

Anyway, the ducks are all in order after 5 months, and I take it you are conveying to us the defendants are not going to gain any insight before their answer.

score so far 0-0 lets begin

Thanks

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply