|
04/12/2010
|
260
|
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Summit Technology Group, LLC.. (Bialecki, Scott) (Entered: 04/12/2010)
|
|
04/12/2010
|
261
|
ANSWER to 194 Amended Complaint,,,, COUNTERCLAIM against e.Digital Corporation by Summit Technology Group, LLC.(Bialecki, Scott) (Entered: 04/12/2010)
|
|
04/15/2010
|
262
|
Proposed Scheduling Order for Markman Issues by Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation. (Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/15/2010)
|
|
04/15/2010
|
277
|
SCHEDULING ORDER FOR MARKMAN ISSUES: Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/15/2010, nunc pro tunc 4/1/2010.(mjwcd) (Entered: 04/20/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
263
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 216 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of VTech Electronics North America LLC by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
264
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 214 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant Imation Corporation by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
265
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 242 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant DXG Technology (USA) Inc. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
266
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 221 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant Leica Camera, Inc. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
267
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 261 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Summit Technology Group LLC by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
268
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 222 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Marantz America, Inc., D&M Holdings US, Inc. and D&M Holdings, Inc. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
269
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 226 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Pentax of America, Inc., Hoya Corporation and Hoya Corporation USA by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
270
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 215 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant Coby Electronics Corp. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
271
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 219 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Panasonic Corporation of North America by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
272
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 220 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Panasonic Corporation by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
273
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 218 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Canon USA Inc. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
274
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 217 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Canon Inc. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
275
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 224 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of HTC America Inc. by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
|
04/19/2010
|
276
|
ANSWER/REPLY to 225 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of HTC Corporation by e.Digital Corporation.(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
|
Nothing new today but I just noticed that Doc 277 was filed by the court on 4/15/10 and I missed it. Not sure why it falls out of sequence with the other docs; perhaps the court clerk entered the file date as the same date it was signed by the judge. These dates are official dates now since Doc 277 was signed by Hon. Judge Watanabe.
Excerpt below is from paragraph 6 of Doc 277 (couldn’t copy/paste so I typed these paragraphs). My guess is a Markman hearing will be scheduled for Aug/Sep 2010, especially considering that the Defendants told the court they want mediation after the Markman decision is known and believe the case will be settled or resolved then. Uploaded the entire Doc 277 on box.net.
--------------
d. April 29, 2010 – Deadline for parties to meet and confer in an effort to agree on proposed constructions;
e. Supplemental Disclosures by Defendants due April 30, 2010:
(i) Documents sufficient to show structure, operation and components of each of the products identified on the list provided by Plaintiff per disclosure (a)(i) for documentation was not provided on April 7.A Defendant may provide exemplary documentation for groupings of accused product if it in good faith believes it is appropriate to do so and it identifies the documentation associated with a particular group of products.
f. May 7, 2010 – Parties file with the Court a Joint claim construction statement that includes identification of the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence to support each proposed construction, and an estimate of the amount of time required for a Markman hearing; and serve any expert reports(s), in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), for any expert(s) who may testify at the Markman hearing, along with a detailed summary of any testimony by any fact witness who will be offering testimony at the Markman hearing;
g. May 24, 2010 – Parties serve rebuttal expert reports of any expert who will be providing rebuttal testimony at the Markman hearing, along with a detailed summary of any testimony by any rebuttal fact witness who will be offering rebuttal testimony at the Markman hearing;
h. June 4, 2010 – Deadline for deposing any expert or fact witness who has been identified to testify at Markman hearing;
i. June 14, 2010 – Parties file opening claim construction briefs;
j. July 12, 2010 – Parties file responsive claim construction briefs;
k. July 19, 2010 – Parties submit respective tutorials (if requested by Court) for claim construction hearing;
l. Claim construction hearing [Markman hearing]: to be scheduled by the Court;
m. 14 days after Court issues a claim construction order – Parties to meet and confer with respect to the current discovery plan for case in view of claim construction decision and any need for a Scheduling Order on the merits; and
n. 28 days after Court issues a claim construction order – Parties to file a Proposed Amended Scheduling Order regarding phase II of discovery on the merits.
