"You make a correct assumption by saying:..."

..the court seems to be centered on claims construction details now leading into a Markman..(this statement would be my thought that the court is more leaning in the Defendants favor utilizing the limited information they have advanced)

"So far, in terms of defendants wanting their Markman Hearing before DISCOVERY taking place, score one for DM-EDING..." (that could be the situation if additional technical details are included in the "Supplemental"

e. Supplemental Disclosures by Defendants due April 30, 2010:

The way I have interpreted things, e.Digital is after a two phase "Discovery" prior to the Markman getting too formalized.

Phase 1. They want a details of how defendants are managing their devices technically, specs, drawings, etc. (they are not satisfied with what has been advanced)

Phase 2. more to the issues in general.

I'll have to read both doc's for a better understanding

Thanks for your input...

doni