Free
Message: Re: PACER -- chicanery
11
Jul 14, 2010 07:34PM
2
Jul 14, 2010 08:02PM
1
Jul 14, 2010 08:07PM

Jul 14, 2010 08:11PM
11
Jul 14, 2010 09:00PM
6
Jul 14, 2010 09:02PM
9
Jul 14, 2010 09:09PM
4
Jul 14, 2010 09:34PM

Learned a new word today from Doc 303..."chicanery". LOL

------------

Moreover, Defendants’ chicanery with their “main memory” verbiage continues in this
portion of their Opening Brief. Reading Defendants’ Opening Brief, one would think the ‘218
Patent discusses “flash memory” as “main memory.” (D. Op. Br. at 17). While Defendants want to turn the “flash memory” discussed in the ‘218 Patent into the “main memory” (in lieu of RAM) of the ‘774 Patent, neither the Patents-in-Suit nor the ‘218 Patent use the term “main memory.” Thus, Defendants’ characterization of the ‘218 Patent as a basis to introduce the concepts of main memory into the claims of the ‘774 Patent is misleading, at best.

------------

chicanery -- noun;

  1. Deception by use of trickery, quibbling, or subterfuge.
  2. (countable, law) A slick performance by a lawyer.
8
Jul 14, 2010 10:26PM
9
Jul 14, 2010 10:45PM
3
Jul 15, 2010 09:44AM
2
Jul 15, 2010 11:37AM
4
Jul 15, 2010 01:03PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply