"I was confused because it appears the Defense argues there is and isn’t RAM included in the 774 patent. It appears that in claim term A. above, the Defense says there is RAM but in claim term B., there isn’t."

I agree with the underline....I disagree with the highlight

A. “flash memory”

Defendants’ Proposed Construction:block erasable non-volatile memory that is the main memory of the system

They want "main memory" identified as RAM

B. “a flash memory module which operates as sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals and is capable of retaining recorded digital information for storage in nonvolatile form”

Defendants’ Proposed Constructions: (1) flash memory module: “a removable, interchangeable flash memory recording medium” and (2) sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals: “the only memory of the received processed sound electrical signals, without another memory system such as RAM.”

They want the "flash memory module" identified as not needing a RAM resource.....putting that burden on the flash module as main memory.

However, IMO, within their quote...(see item 2) for additional considered verbiage modifications, they have a somewhat contradicting consideration. The memory is considered to receive a per processed issue...and then consider the memory module as not needing RAM resource.

In other words...what difference does it make if you identify the memory module not needing or without another memory system such as RAM.” if there is a preprocessed consideration in front of it.

IMO, for the defendants over all considerations...both A and B are considering the context of "main memory" to mean...RAM

Woodys consideration of 'main memory" is storage....and that is how it's considered through his testimony and in the amendment remarks.

doni