Free
Message: Re: doni?
5
Feb 01, 2011 09:56AM
3
Feb 01, 2011 11:11AM
5
Feb 01, 2011 11:52AM
5
Feb 01, 2011 11:55AM
4
Feb 01, 2011 12:11PM
1
Feb 01, 2011 01:28PM
5
Feb 01, 2011 02:20PM
3
Feb 01, 2011 09:16PM
23
Feb 01, 2011 11:46PM
3
Feb 02, 2011 12:01AM
2
Feb 02, 2011 12:11AM
22
Feb 02, 2011 06:50AM
7
Feb 02, 2011 08:30AM
3
Feb 02, 2011 08:48AM
7
Feb 02, 2011 09:00AM
5
Feb 02, 2011 09:52AM
10
Feb 02, 2011 09:53AM
3
Feb 02, 2011 10:21AM

"when all these years your main contention for the patents was the fact that RAM is not needed"

really? ......lol

They have a very controlled detail when it comes to RAM resource.

They're out to stop cheaters form utilizing those details...no matter what size RAM implementation cheaters might be using or what foot print of the RAM they utilize.

For now, just figure that the defendants are using their RAM issues as a blinder to hide behind.....and they want to make a point that e.Digital does not utilize RAM resources.

One of my contentions from the very beginning was to point to the RAM issue to find a potential cheater. Thing is, cheaters are not going to blatantly implement RAM details physically in the same manner as e.Digital, that would signal infringement....no, they're going to hide behind unscaled issues in order to stay invisible, while... utilizing I/O and data structure considerations in front of it and the flash.

doni


Feb 02, 2011 03:10PM
8
Feb 02, 2011 03:25PM
2
Feb 02, 2011 03:51PM
6
Feb 02, 2011 04:32PM
6
Feb 02, 2011 05:10PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply