O.K., junior:...

Listen to this 81 byear old SENIOR...

Your are WRONG, WORNG, WRONG...

It is your "Bitterness" coming through because the Judge is taking this LONGGG...

The FACTS are otherwise...

1. Edig has been holding the .08-.09 CENT RANGE FOR A LONG TIME. It did not reverse split its stock by a factor of 1 to 10 as CITI BANK did, and they are going down now...

All you have to do look at the following table that shows the MMS think the uptrend for this stock is worth keeping it. The ASKS are getting higher as we all wait for the decision by the judge.

2. EDIG case is not a DIVORCE case that the Judge will issue a "Lets split the difference" decision. The pleadings filed by the parties are clear. They each made their position clear. There is no "In bewteen position" in this case.

The judge has to follow the Law, (The Phillips case), (which is Favorable to EDIG), or she can ignore it and rule as defendants asked her to...

The only rational explanation for the length of time is the fact that this judge has to apply the LAW of the Phillips case to 6 of the remaining claims that were not "TRIED" before her in the MH. This makes for extra work to write a decision that will pass the scruting of the 10th Appellate District...

So, as the British say, hold your chin up and your best wishes are to come true any day now...

GLTU...

Gil...