Re: The tricky thing about a settlement is ...
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 28, 2011 01:16PM
"That is true; and the PR didn't say anything about a one-time payment. However that
doesn't mean we didn't receive one, only that Panasonic wanted to keep that detail confidential."
With profound respect....Baloney! It also doesn't mean EDIG didn't win the NJ Lottery, either. I understand these NDAs are part of the quid pro quo process, but this appears to be a pattern that makes the assessment of the value of these settlements virtually impossible. There's a fundamental flaw here somewhere but, without details, I can't determine what it is. Too much is being withheld from the SHs.