rephrase....sorry...

claim 19(analog issues) has two memory options "recording medium"(analog memory) and "Flash memory"(digital memory).....

claim 1(digital issues) has but one memory issue....flash memory(digital memory)

"Flash memory" of claim 1 and 19 is used for both file types....and that is what the verbiage is conceived around.

Irrigardless of how patent is preceive ....regarding Flash memory "Sole memory of the received and processed sound electrical signals" ....that clause covers both issues stored on "Flash memory" of claim 1 and 19.

IMO, the court had no right to split that phrase.....as the USPTO allowed it.

Other issues:

There's a difference between the two types of memory, with that, there is one clause of both memory types "recording medium" and "flash memory"....that treats them the same.

"capable of retaining recorded digital information for storage"

"digital information" is the media data(737 patent) residing for each file type....stored on the analog memory or digital memory.

doni