Free
Message: Re: The conventional wisdom...
19
Jan 31, 2012 01:59PM
4
Jan 31, 2012 02:39PM

Jan 31, 2012 02:39PM
4
Jan 31, 2012 02:45PM

Jan 31, 2012 03:05PM
3
Jan 31, 2012 04:25PM
5
Jan 31, 2012 05:30PM

"because apparently they overlooked some key issues the first time around?"

With all due respect....collectively, they emphatically understand what the patents are about.

Believe it, or not, they wrote this phrase after explaining their circuitry issues in the 774 patent and published it in front of the condensed claims....

"It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications to circuitry and design could be made the to embodiment disclosed herein. It is to be understood that such modifications are intended to be comprehended within the present invention, as defined by the following claims."

They have not overlooked anything and that phrase has everything to do with the subject matter of the re-exam. The circuitry issues are being explained to defend the questions raised by the defendants that initiated the re-exam.

doni

3
Jan 31, 2012 07:08PM
2
Feb 01, 2012 12:59AM
3
Feb 01, 2012 01:06AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply