Free
Message: Re: 774 amendment
3
May 18, 2012 10:00AM

May 18, 2012 10:17AM
5
May 18, 2012 11:11AM
1
May 18, 2012 11:48AM
9
May 18, 2012 12:09PM

May 18, 2012 12:21PM
9
May 18, 2012 12:35PM

Im not sure that I can give much insight on this.

The smallest possible change to the patent and get it passed the examiner would be the best.

So its a trade off. Change it just enough to pass, but dont change anymore than you absolutely have to.

For some reason the Patent Attorneys felt the described change and the new claims were needed. They cerntainly know much more about it that I do.

One point is I like that they said "transistor" and not MOSFET. That is a very smart move. A MOSFET is a transistor, but not all transistors are MOSFETs. Nobody uses MOSFETs anymore. Everybody still uses transistors of course.

Time will tell. This stuff requires the patience of a Monk.....

3
May 18, 2012 01:20PM
4
May 18, 2012 01:20PM
1
May 18, 2012 01:25PM
11
May 18, 2012 04:35PM
2
May 18, 2012 09:43PM
4
May 20, 2012 12:01AM
3
May 20, 2012 12:34AM
3
May 21, 2012 02:26PM
1
May 21, 2012 03:42PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply