I'm waiting for techwiz and others to disect the added claims, but for now, my thoughts based on "hints"/statements made by the company, the added claims are for the most part "clarity" as well as a response to what took place in the interview/negotiations concerning what was acceptable for the examiner to reconsider approval. Whether or not anything "brand new" is involved vs just clarifying the original claims....church is still out from my prospective.

At a quick glance skimming thru the documents, to me it looks positive in general but one never knows about this stuff...do we?