Free
Message: Re: Pacer Notice of joinder by Woodman -But, its too late & not supported by judge!

rephrase...before plank sees it...lol

Spirit...no hard feelings...here are the last filings on Woodman....

11/08/2013

72

NOTICE of Joinder by Woodman Labs, Inc. to Amend Stipulated Partial Judgment to Certify the Collateral Estoppel Order for Immediate Appeal (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A: Proposed Amended Partial Judgment, # 2 Declaration of Kohm)(Sacksteder, Michael) (Entered: 11/08/2013)

===========

11/08/2013 73

NOTICE of Joinder by Woodman Labs, Inc. Joining Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Sacksteder, Michael) (Entered: 11/08/2013)

===========

As of the two above filings....Woodman Notices to join two of Apple's motions.

11/22/2013 74

RESPONSE re 72 Notice of Joinder, e.Digital Corporations Notice Of Opposition To GoPros Notice Of Joinder In Motion To Amend The Stipulated Partial Judgment To Certify The Collateral Estoppel Order For Immediate Appeal; Request For Judicial Notice; And, Exhibits 1-3 filed by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Chalk, Pamela) (aef). (Entered: 11/22/2013)

============

12/02/2013 75

JOINT HEARING STATEMENT by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Appendix B (Part 1), # 3 Appendix B (Part 2))(Hedrick, Gabriel) (aef). (Entered: 12/02/2013)

============

12/06/2013 76

NOTICE of Joinder by Woodman Labs, Inc. re 73 Notice of Joinder re Reply in Support of Motion to Amend the Stipulated Judgment and Response to Objection to Declaration of Bryan A. Kohm (Kohm, Bryan) (aef). (Entered: 12/06/2013)

============

Doc 74 e.Digital then objects to the Woodman notice doc 72 to amend the SPJ.....

Doc 76 Kohm objects to the e.Digitals Objection of the Kohm Declaration of doc 73...

Thing is, Kohm identifies the wrong doc file....he identifies 73 as "Notice of Joinder re Reply in Support of Motion to Amend the Stipulated Judgment " 73 is "Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal'

little confusion there...

======

The court has not weighed in on e.Digitals considerations of Woodman's Joinder considerations yet......

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply