Re: Pacer Notice of joinder by Woodman -But, its too late & not supported by judge!
posted on
Dec 10, 2013 09:40AM
rephrase...before plank sees it...lol
Spirit...no hard feelings...here are the last filings on Woodman....
11/08/2013 |
72 |
NOTICE of Joinder by Woodman Labs, Inc. to Amend Stipulated Partial Judgment to Certify the Collateral Estoppel Order for Immediate Appeal (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A: Proposed Amended Partial Judgment, # 2 Declaration of Kohm)(Sacksteder, Michael) (Entered: 11/08/2013) =========== |
11/08/2013 | 73 |
NOTICE of Joinder by Woodman Labs, Inc. Joining Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Sacksteder, Michael) (Entered: 11/08/2013) =========== |
As of the two above filings....Woodman Notices to join two of Apple's motions.
11/22/2013 | 74 |
RESPONSE re 72 Notice of Joinder, e.Digital Corporations Notice Of Opposition To GoPros Notice Of Joinder In Motion To Amend The Stipulated Partial Judgment To Certify The Collateral Estoppel Order For Immediate Appeal; Request For Judicial Notice; And, Exhibits 1-3 filed by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Chalk, Pamela) (aef). (Entered: 11/22/2013) ============ |
12/02/2013 | 75 |
JOINT HEARING STATEMENT by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Appendix B (Part 1), # 3 Appendix B (Part 2))(Hedrick, Gabriel) (aef). (Entered: 12/02/2013) ============ |
12/06/2013 | 76 |
NOTICE of Joinder by Woodman Labs, Inc. re 73 Notice of Joinder re Reply in Support of Motion to Amend the Stipulated Judgment and Response to Objection to Declaration of Bryan A. Kohm (Kohm, Bryan) (aef). (Entered: 12/06/2013) ============ |
Doc 74 e.Digital then objects to the Woodman notice doc 72 to amend the SPJ.....
Doc 76 Kohm objects to the e.Digitals Objection of the Kohm Declaration of doc 73...
Thing is, Kohm identifies the wrong doc file....he identifies 73 as "Notice of Joinder re Reply in Support of Motion to Amend the Stipulated Judgment " 73 is "Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal'
little confusion there...
======
The court has not weighed in on e.Digitals considerations of Woodman's Joinder considerations yet......
doni