Free
Message: Re: PACER - e.Digital Corporation v. Apple Inc. ( new filed January 6 )

"Point to why 108 & 445 are still in play with Samsung."

You have to compare the Samsung PR statement to the statements of the other defendant PR's that settled in the TEXAS 7 case.

RE: Samsung

"Under the terms of the confidential agreement, Samsung obtained a license and release on e.Digital’s foreign and domestic patent rights, including the Company’s Flash-R™ patent portfolio, and e.Digital obtained a license and release on certain Samsung patents."

RE: typical of others, here is CASIO...

PR12/2/2008 "announced today that it has entered into a settlement and cross-licensing agreement with Casio. Under the terms of the confidential agreement, Casio obtained a license and release on all e.Digital foreign and domestic patent rights, including the Company's Flash-R™ patent portfolio,

The word all is important, if it's not mentioned.... your not getting all.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply