"I certainly hope not, but they could also appeal the latest ruling as a delaying/money drain tactic"

They would have to come up with some convincing details that would put the continuity of 108 and 774 in direct relation.... it doesn't exist.

IMO, an attempt would not pass the litmus test for the appeals court to except the case. IMVO, e.Digitals litmus test was approved to be heard, because of 108 and its continuity not being directly connected to 774.

Going against continuity considerations, as detailed by the USPTO, would decidedly change the manners of recording applications and patents of the USPTO…continuity methods would not be necessary…. All owner patents would be tied together in a lump.

This is what upset me from the beginning, continuity matters....where I feel the SC court knew this, however did as it did to tie up e.Digital....it makes no sense what the SC court did. Along with breaking the SPJ's.... it previously sanctioned.

doni