e.DIGITAL -OTHER WORLD COMPUTING- settlement & dismiss with prejudice
in response to
by
Message: Time & Sales - Tuesday 2/3/15 Vol 22,015 Closed at $0.1025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-cv-2915-H-BGS
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
[Doc. No. 31]
vs.
OTHER WORLD COMPUTING,
INC.,
Defendant.
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed its complaint against
Defendant Other World Computing, Inc. (Doc. No. 1.) On January 6, 2015, the parties filed a notice of settlement and joint motion to continue all deadlines until January 30, 2015 pending settlement. (Doc. No. 29.) On January 23, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice all of the claims in the case. (Doc. No. 31.)
The Court, for good cause shown, grants the parties’ joint motion and dismisses the action with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
The Court further orders:
1. The parties will bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees
associated with the prosecution and defense of this action; and
2. The Court directs the clerk to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 29, 2015
______________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-cv-2915-H-BGS
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
[Doc. No. 31]
vs.
OTHER WORLD COMPUTING,
INC.,
Defendant.
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed its complaint against
Defendant Other World Computing, Inc. (Doc. No. 1.) On January 6, 2015, the parties filed a notice of settlement and joint motion to continue all deadlines until January 30, 2015 pending settlement. (Doc. No. 29.) On January 23, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice all of the claims in the case. (Doc. No. 31.)
The Court, for good cause shown, grants the parties’ joint motion and dismisses the action with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
The Court further orders:
1. The parties will bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees
associated with the prosecution and defense of this action; and
2. The Court directs the clerk to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 29, 2015
______________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply