We were all out on thin ice...
A lot of work went into 774 and a lot of work by Handal went into 774. His game plan from my prospective, was to use 108 as a support issue only in re-litigating 774 into a claims construction hearing. All that work went right down the drain.
The CE ruling tying 108 to 774 must have been a real shocker to Handal and a complete downer. I know it was for me me.
It's like starting from scratch, after you swim across the ocean and back first to gain possession of your 108. Then you get to start form scratch with half issues already ruled against 774, the opposite was going to happen against 108, where he straightened that out .
Others may not appreciate but I do.
I'm back on thick ice.
doni
