He's specifically pointing to e.Digitals efforts past and present.

IMO, it's the legal system, subconsciously, he has a problem with.

I do not have a problem with e.Digital what so ever....but the legal system ...is functionally nothing but a free for all.

The Federal Circuit is a free for all at the civil level...nothing more than leaves blowing in the wind....that may, or may not require a civil case be reviewed by Federal appeal.

Now we are contending with AIA (America Invents Act) issues. Pushed and Lobbied by big business...where Congress amends on their behalf. Where, ironically, Congressional statue laws exist of procedures that these companies are to follow, that are not being adhered to.

These are the issues that make me sick.

Tagging 108 to 774's specific issues was sickening...and it was done for only one sensible reason...KILL TIME.

Fortunately, the process was not a complete throwaway, 108 and 774 where determined to be separate patent entities with separate issues. We did not have to wait for the civil court to come up with that determination....which would have been a coin toss.

Giants is waiting on the legal issues in the hope it can resolve issues for e.Digital....we are blowing in the wind on one legal issue at the moment.

What Giants can't seem to comprehend, that is what most all are waiting on ....and belittling the company does no good what so ever. As this one issue is out of e.Digitals hands and has nothing directly to do with e.Digital. The immediate problem could be anyone's problem. Not adhering to Congressional statute law is a direct violation to anyone's rights and that is basically what Purcell is trying to convey to the PTO review board.

It doesn't get any more sickening than that.

doni