Frank, if you read this ....and then re-read my The history as published.... perhaps it will be much more appreciable.
RE Handal comment...."They also appear to be asserting that the Flashback device technology was material to the ‘108 patent, should have been disclosed to the USPTO, and that the inventors intentionally withheld such information from the USPTO.'
LINK
108 is not material to the flashBack player....what Daberko testified to, having noted it was a long time ago...IMO, the published history of events would have superseded his testomony.
Anyway..it doesn't matter any more....the claim of inequitable conduct is over as I see it.
doni
