Why would they license? The patents are not real until they become real. Would you license a bucket with, possible, holes?

We have a great claims ruling, you can now equate one tiny fraction of it to a real world situation...without any confusion.

However, the IPR's hold them back from being real.

When/if they get over that hump they become real.

This is where one gambles, there is just no way of knowing how they rule, or what the PPS does if ruled positively....three judges decide this issue...where the possibility of sour politics is, some what, balanced. Where, IMO, the efficiency and creditability of the PTO is questioned, as these are new patents of a novel nature prosecuted under unpublished secrecy for a reason.

This last call is it, are we a company, or are we not?

There's not much more to it than that, not for me anyway.

First application filed 09-28-2010...and I'd say there was minimum 3 years of documented prep in front of that.

"Software is king and hardware is along for the ride" search that, if you will, to understand my next comment.

That may be the case, however, e.Digital knows BOTH intimately in very novel ways.

GLTA who have hung on for so long.

doni