Re: USPTO Asks Supreme Court To Save Claim Construction Test
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 28, 2016 01:26PM
From the response, we have the opposit consideration...
"Petitioners offer claim constructions for the terms “social template,” “social
hierarchy,” and “level of a social hierarchy,” all of which either conflict with
and/or are narrower than constructions found by the Court in the related District
Court case."
The match up for the above comments...
Owner:
A. “unique social signature” Mutually agreed construction civil court, e.Digital states now it can rectify the IPR proceedings with a construction...
Petitioner:
B. “social template” Mutually agreed construction civil court,...... conflict with
C. “social hierarchy” Court construed: “an arrangement of persons and/or operations in a series of ordered levels.” (narrower than constructions found by the Court)
D. “level of [a] social hierarchy” not construed...... (narrower than constructions found by the Court)...... if ruled....“a grouping of people that receives information,”
doni