From the response, we have the opposit consideration...

"Petitioners offer claim constructions for the terms “social template,” “social

hierarchy,” and “level of a social hierarchy,” all of which either conflict with

and/or are narrower than constructions found by the Court in the related District

Court case."

The match up for the above comments...

Owner:

A. “unique social signature” Mutually agreed construction civil court, e.Digital states now it can rectify the IPR proceedings with a construction...

Petitioner:

B. “social template” Mutually agreed construction civil court,...... conflict with

C. “social hierarchy” Court construed: “an arrangement of persons and/or operations in a series of ordered levels.” (narrower than constructions found by the Court)

D. “level of [a] social hierarchy” not construed...... (narrower than constructions found by the Court)...... if ruled....“a grouping of people that receives information,”

doni