IMHO the near term important date regarding this case is June 9, 2016. The pending Ruling on a request for "Stay" pending IPR and Case Management Conference. IMHO an ADR if the case is Granted a Stay would be a Mute issue. On the other hand IMHO the posibility of a "Stay" is not a given based on the "Patents in Play". My "Question" If the Judge denies the request that he has not yet ruled an ADR would be benifitial to both parties. Wouldn't Ismart need to request a IPR on the Patents being litigated against them that they alledgedly infringe to be granted the stay? I am of the "Opinion" that the Patents are not the same currently pending IPR unless I overlooked reviewing a piece to this case. Just thinking out loud and welcome coments from those following this and other cases.