PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT/TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE No parties are present. AS TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Counsel argue to the Court. For the reasons set forth on the record, The Court declines Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the counterclaims asserted by the Defendants, particularly breach of contract, unpaid compensation, conversion, breach of good faith and unfair dealing, and unjust enrichment and with respect to whether or not the obligation becomes due and owing. AS TO THE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE: The Court informs counsel of the current restrictions in place with respect to setting jury trials due to COVID-19 and encourages the parties to attempt to resolve as many of the issues as possible. Court and counsel confer as to how to proceed. FILED GARY L. HARRISON CLERK, SUPERIOR COURT 11/6/2020 10:27:33 AM By: B. Ramirez M I N U T E E N T R Y Page 2 Date: November 04, 2020 Case No.: C20194139 T. Enos Deputy Clerk IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The deposition of Defendant James Brisco shall be scheduled no later than January 31, 2021. 2. Counsel shall mutually contact Judge Gordon, preferably, or another Superior Court Judge to schedule a settlement conference date after the Defendant’s deposition but before February 26, 2021. Over the Objection of Mr. Zarkou, IT IS ORDERED the Trial Setting Conference set this date is reset to March 1, 2021, at 9:30 AM, in Division 28. 

Russell J. Zarkou, Esq. counsel for Defendants/Counter