Hey Folks;

Kemo, I'm with you on that response. I never once said that everything Lori did or didn't do at the Calgary information update had my blessings or rejections. All I said was --walk a mile in those shoes before you critisize. Know all the facts before you label her decision as wrong. I'll tell you right now that unless you are wearing her shoes ---you can't possibly know all the facts.

There is a very good possibility that the reason Lori was so edgy and protective at the meeting is because of lack of sleep---after all she has lost over 75% of her share value as well. She is having fingers pointed at her as though its ALL her fault that the SP is in the tank. I'm not saying that part of it is not her fault---but that is why she is the CEO, and I'm just one shareholder. In the future--- we may all be applauding her decision to hold back some of the facts. Only time will give us those answers.

I too---apologize, if it sounds like I am defending all her actions as tho they were gospel. To me, her decisions are the decisions only a CEO that knows all the circumstances and facts can make. Ya can't have the Tail wagging the Dog. Shareholders should be able to influence, but only a majority of shareholders should be able to rule---and then only through a board of directors.

Its MY fault that I bought some shares at .15 cents and sold them at .45 cents when they were tripled. Its also MY fault that I bought shares at $1.25 and did not sell them when they hit $2.50 and then dropped to .60 cents. Why did I do that??? Some call it Greed --- others call it belief----I'll just call it --my liitle jewel in the ruff-- that keeps me working 6am to 8pm and feeding those damn ducks that I know will feed me very well some day. Nuff Said

Rinky