If you are referring to the erroneous stock share price history in the SEC filing, there is nothing "alleged" about it. The information was completely wrong. You certainly have the analytical ability to look up the real price history yourself and compare it to the submitted numbers.

The only question is whether it was intentional deception or gross incompetence. Are either of those acceptable in your opinion for a publicly traded company? Or are you with the "typo/misprint" excuse crowd? If one number is wrong, that might be a typo. If only one is right, that is something completely different.