Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Jim Gray--Galore Creek
1
Sep 23, 2012 08:08AM

Sep 23, 2012 11:17AM

....we are talking billions of dollars here, Teck will be looking at everything very very closly, they owe it to their shareholders.

Every 1% of Schaft Creek and surrounding areas is worth Billions for years to come. If they take anything less than 75% , they're loosing multi billions. (considering what they're paying for it, in reality CUU's portion 1x expenditure = 80million)

Lose multi multi Billions for 80 million ???? NO.

Even worst, not taking out the remaining % (CUU & our 4 year clause) is risking losing it all, the whole 75%. Again multi billions.

So yes, Teck owes it to their shareholders to not play stupid.

Pay the 2.5+ Billion for CUU and secure 100% for 100 years to come, with the possibility of selling it in blocks and keeping operatorship.

This, with no risk of losing it, no 4 year clause up their %?& and no risk of CUU transfering the same agreement to a bigger fish who won't be so cooperative with Teck and that could have the time and power (voting shares) to enforce the clause, making Teck lose it all and come out with ZERO.

4
Sep 23, 2012 11:58AM

Sep 23, 2012 12:01PM

Sep 23, 2012 12:26PM
14
Sep 23, 2012 12:45PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 01:11PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:13PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 01:21PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:56PM
11
Sep 23, 2012 02:04PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 02:29PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:37PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 02:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:45PM
5
Sep 23, 2012 02:49PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 02:54PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:01PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:04PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:10PM

Sep 23, 2012 03:14PM
25
Sep 23, 2012 03:16PM
7
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 03:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:50PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:54PM
9
Sep 23, 2012 04:09PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 04:24PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:47PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 04:52PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:55PM
12
Sep 23, 2012 05:01PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 05:07PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 05:17PM
22
Sep 23, 2012 05:39PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 05:56PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 06:17PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 07:58PM

Sep 23, 2012 08:05PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 08:08PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 08:13PM

Sep 23, 2012 10:05PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 10:32AM
3
Sep 24, 2012 10:42AM

Sep 24, 2012 01:52PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 01:53PM
6
Sep 24, 2012 02:01PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply