Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Jim Gray--Galore Creek
1
Sep 23, 2012 08:08AM

Sep 23, 2012 11:17AM
21
Sep 23, 2012 11:52AM
4
Sep 23, 2012 11:58AM

Sep 23, 2012 12:01PM

Sep 23, 2012 12:26PM

Sorry, read your reply again, I guess you did touch on the legal stuff....the above suggests that you think cf may not be able to enforce the 4 year clause if I read it correctly? That a larger, stronger player might be needed to fight Teck over the agreement?

No. I do think CUU is capable, pretty easy. As Elmer said to me, they have it black on white and Teck wasn't even around in those days. I'm sure Hector Mackay's firm looked at this. The insider ownership here speaks confidence. They have Teck trapped.

My comment revolves around time. CUU has stated they want to sell. If not to Teck it'll be to someone else.

A larger, stronger player as you say won't mind waiting around 4 years to see Teck fail trying to bring Schaft Creek into full commercial production. At that point they enforce it and get 100%.

As Mike once said to me, 1st Teck would have to start building the day they back in to even have a remote chance of making it. Then you have the cold long winters, labor issues, roads aren't built, equipment etc etc etc....

So will Teck take 75% of Billions for 80 million....Yes

Will Teck deal with this major time pressure and risk losing it all...NO

They just need to do 1 thing...

2
Sep 23, 2012 01:11PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:13PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 01:21PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:56PM
11
Sep 23, 2012 02:04PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 02:29PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:37PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 02:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:45PM
5
Sep 23, 2012 02:49PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 02:54PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:01PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:04PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:10PM

Sep 23, 2012 03:14PM
25
Sep 23, 2012 03:16PM
7
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 03:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:50PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:54PM
9
Sep 23, 2012 04:09PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 04:24PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:47PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 04:52PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:55PM
12
Sep 23, 2012 05:01PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 05:07PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 05:17PM
22
Sep 23, 2012 05:39PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 05:56PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 06:17PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 07:58PM

Sep 23, 2012 08:05PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 08:08PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 08:13PM

Sep 23, 2012 10:05PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 10:32AM
3
Sep 24, 2012 10:42AM

Sep 24, 2012 01:52PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 01:53PM
6
Sep 24, 2012 02:01PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply