Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Jim Gray--Galore Creek
1
Sep 23, 2012 08:08AM

Sep 23, 2012 11:17AM
21
Sep 23, 2012 11:52AM
4
Sep 23, 2012 11:58AM

Sep 23, 2012 12:01PM

Sep 23, 2012 12:26PM
14
Sep 23, 2012 12:45PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 01:11PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:13PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 01:21PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:56PM
11
Sep 23, 2012 02:04PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 02:29PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:37PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 02:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:45PM
5
Sep 23, 2012 02:49PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 02:54PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:01PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:04PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:10PM

Sep 23, 2012 03:14PM

my point was that Teck isn't our friend, they are a business partner and they are more then likely pissed to have given this away.

Where does this notion that Teck is pissed to have given this away, come from? They have many, many contracts with juniors who go out and spend other people's money to explore. Teck couldn't possibly spend all that money on their own exploring everywhere. They just sit back and wait for something promising to be proven up, to have the feasibility produced that will show there are minerals in the ground and that it is cost-efficient to mine them. Then they get to step in and for a pittance, in our case about a quarter $million, take the lion's share of the project. Sure if they want it all they will have to buy us out but then they could easily sell off a portion to another major and make money doing so.

I don't think this makes them pissed...I think this makes them very, very pleased to have one of their junior ventures come to fruition. The juniors are taking all the risks, not Teck.

7
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 03:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:50PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:54PM
9
Sep 23, 2012 04:09PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 04:24PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:47PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 04:52PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:55PM
12
Sep 23, 2012 05:01PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 05:07PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 05:17PM
22
Sep 23, 2012 05:39PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 05:56PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 06:17PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 07:58PM

Sep 23, 2012 08:05PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 08:08PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 08:13PM

Sep 23, 2012 10:05PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 10:32AM
3
Sep 24, 2012 10:42AM

Sep 24, 2012 01:52PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 01:53PM
6
Sep 24, 2012 02:01PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply