Good report Pat66, thanks for sharing.

I wonder why the drilling question gets the standard response of 'not wanting to delay FS' when we were drilling other targets and had much more of that non-FS drilling to do.

I can accept that the FS work had to stop at some point and delivered but what about the other non- FS related drilling? The fact that all the 2012 work was inside the Sched A lands is somewhat puzzling too. Why not dabble outside the Agreement lands and demonstrate a target or so with a drill? It's not like we are short targets.

I still come back with the notion that Elmer wants to unzipp the non-backin lands (non Sched A lands) lands with CUU 2.0.