I don't think so. Look at the bid ask gap. In machine wars the gap increases and the volume dries up. That may seem counter intuitive but these are not people trading on emotion.

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/speeches/2011/speech509.pdf

Have a read. Really, the stuff I've been blogging about is now backed by the Gold Report, Equidia and a number of people with big reputations. It is not none-sense. I'm an expert in machine logic. I know where they can take this. That's why I've been telling people for a long time that this was only a matter of time. My first article on this was in 1985. It got the same laughter as the stuff on hand held computers you could video conference on. People didn't see the technology developing that fast. They also thought the battery power required would be a stumbling block longer than the components required to build it would be.

Chess programs were somewhat of a joke back then too. Now look. So if you think computer aided humans won't rise to the top, guess again. They are practicing on the junior sector because they can get away with it. This is the testing ground for what gets played out on the main markets. You thought the AP hack was something? Wait until a small army of programmers gets a guy like me to guide them. The globe will need to hope it's not a terrorist group. BTW, this is the new battle ground. Don't for a minute think that the military is not working up defences. You will be trying to trade/invest in a nuclear landscape within 2 years. It's already happening.