Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: you wouldn't believe it
1
Sep 30, 2013 01:16PM
1
Sep 30, 2013 01:26PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 01:40PM
6
Sep 30, 2013 01:42PM
1
Sep 30, 2013 01:48PM
3
Sep 30, 2013 02:03PM
14
Sep 30, 2013 02:03PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 02:27PM

Okay, I did a quick search and found some more chatter surrounding, "you won't believe the numbers" quote from Elmer. It seems like it wasn't just Canada Grant that he was talking to, although CG seems to have referenced that conversation more lately.

As far as I can tell Elmer was referring to the costs in the FS. This has brought back some memories of my conversations with him and Mike at the time. There was speculation that our costs on the FS might actually go lower than on the pre-FS. That was because some of the material prices had lowered over the intervening years, and labour costs during the pre-FS were at an all-time high. I believe it was Cathie who told me that they were hoping the costs would be lower. He was right, some of the costs did actually go down and that was surprising since there had been a lot of talk generally about rising costs.

In that sense they were right because there was some industry skepticism that those numbers could be real. Teck did a lot of work on their own to check the numbers.

This is from the FS news release, and I suspect this might be the point that they were referring to when anyone said, "you won't believe the numbers."

The project has a nominal 130,000 tpd milling capacity over a 21 year mine life representing a 30% increase from that proposed in the Preliminary Feasibility Study prepared in September 2008, with only a 20% increase in the estimated Capex, no easy achievement.

Context is everything.

2
Sep 30, 2013 02:52PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 03:01PM
6
Sep 30, 2013 03:03PM
8
Sep 30, 2013 03:24PM
4
Sep 30, 2013 03:50PM
3
Sep 30, 2013 04:17PM
3
Sep 30, 2013 04:22PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 04:22PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 04:24PM
3
T2T
Sep 30, 2013 04:35PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 04:44PM
6
Sep 30, 2013 04:46PM
1
Sep 30, 2013 04:54PM
5
Sep 30, 2013 05:14PM
1
T2T
Sep 30, 2013 05:40PM
6
Sep 30, 2013 06:22PM
5
T2T
Sep 30, 2013 07:47PM
3
Sep 30, 2013 07:48PM
2
Sep 30, 2013 08:03PM
3
Sep 30, 2013 08:24PM
7
Sep 30, 2013 09:17PM
5
T2T
Sep 30, 2013 10:17PM
4
Oct 01, 2013 08:38AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply