Re: Whatever happened to ......
posted on
Oct 06, 2014 12:26PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
"Sorry but I won't. The huge discrepancy in the "numbers" is the reason the share price is at eighteen cents. Ninety million dollars to get two studies that go from huge to hardly profitable and way over the self imposed timelines, deadlines and with no explaination other than "the weather" is beyond me. I have a bundle in this and am not going to go away or tell other people what a great investment this is. It isn't and I'm not pathetic enough to do it."
What proof can you provide that the reason the share price is low is caused by the "numbers". You completly miss what I am trying to say, as you never talk about the "numbers" and just whine about it being on the website until the release of the FS. Along with that I am very sure that the differences have been explained to you many times now and you can also look for yourself and see why.