Re: Optimization studies
posted on
Dec 01, 2014 02:15PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Ahh, actually, yes, I do. There is no evidence that Teck approved the 2012 FS. Although it appears to us that this project is shrouded in secrecy which some of us interpret as "something's cooking", current indications from both Copper Fox and Teck are that they continue to Optimize the project, have not started early stage developments, have not submitted an EA application and have done only a minimal amout of drilling per year. Teck has been doing essentially the same with Galore for years and years on end...
That is not why Teck owns 75%. The ownership percentage, although matching the Salazar agreement option to acquire 75% through $360 M in spending, is actually the result of a JV agreement that was NOT triggerred by the Salazar agreement, but rather one that simulated ownership end results of one of the Salazar options. The News Release clearly indicated that the the JV was formulated outside Salazar. This does not support the contention that the 2012 FS was "approved" as contended in your post. If the 2012 FS was approved why are the Schaft Creek Reserves not included in Teck's list of reserves, like that of Galore?
Capable of bringing it to production; yes, but again, we can look at what Teck has been doing with our neighbour Galore. Essentially Optimizing for years and years without any indication of moving to production.
JMHO