Ok fair, but seeing as he takes 300k a yr for doing what he does without any value to shareholders is evidence that he at be very minimum is ok to just get paid and do nothing more.  Granted it's been said the end game is to sell stuff and make money, but 15 yrs nothing of that sort has taken place...where as his paycheck has, without fail most definitely taken place.  So the evidence pints to the notion that he is happy with his paycheck and with the status quo, which is not doing anything of value for shareholders and still getting paid for said sfa... Again, I truly do wish your statement is true af, really do.  I just go off evidence and past performance which is the only thing we can go off in life, everything else is speculation imo