Don: So do I understand you correctly that you think it is right to attack the messenger so as to allow false hope (offered by people posting here) to go unquestioned? Of course I didn't want failure for the opt ins, I'm sure I've said exactly the opposite. Of course I want shareholders to get more money. But I don't want false hope.

But now that it appears to have failed, did the false hope help? Fortunately it doesn't seem to have cost us much, perhaps 0.1 cents per share.

Did the false hope given by posters here saying Fung could raise capital to avoid bankruptcy help? (Was KRY still listed when this was said?)

Did the false hope help when Tenor came along and posters here praised them as saving us from the evil bondholders? Did it delay us taking action to prevent Tenor getting 88%?

Did the false hope help when posters here said we'll have the permit by Easter? (Was this when you switched to the light?)

Did the false hope help when those here claimed Fung was a genius and Belanger a fraud when GRZ went to ICSID?

Did allowing false hope help by banning anyone who questioned it, including you.